PFEW: ‘Computer misuse is a serious issue’

POLICE officers are persistently falling foul of data protection laws and ending up either in court or at a misconduct hearing, the Police Federation of England and Wales has warned.

“Computer misuse is a serious issue and if officers commit data protection breaches – outside of lawful policing purposes – they are likely to face very significant penalties,” the PFEW said.

Technology such as the Police National Computer (PNC) and Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) is increasingly being used by officers for non-work related reasons.

Andy Ward, the Federation’s Deputy General Secretary and Head of Crime and Misconduct Claims, said: “We’re seeing about two cases a week involving data protection breaches. In the majority of cases, the officer thinks that they are doing it for the right reasons – they’re either looking into family members, friends, neighbours or others they know, often because they are concerned about those individuals or people close to them.”

But even if the officer thinks that they are taking the moral high ground, their actions are landing them in trouble, added PFEW.

Mr Ward said: “If officers have concerns about people they know, or if they are approached to access the PNC for a friend, then there are ways of dealing with these issues without breaking the law.

“Officers need to distance themselves, and raise the concerns in the first instance to their supervisor who will decide on the best course of action and, if they are for lawful policing purposes, may be able to conduct intelligence searches on their behalf, or pass it on to someone who can.

“What they should not do, for example, is take the law into their own hands and look up their ex-wife’s new boyfriend themselves – even if it is because they are worried about the safety of their children – or find out who owns the car parked across the street. Those types of actions are only likely to lead them into serious trouble.”

In an average year the Federation HQ:

• spends around £17million on legal advice and representation in civil and criminal cases
• deals with more than 6,000 applications for legal assistance, including employment tribunal cases
• receives about 2,500 criminal and misconduct allegations at the joint claims office – although there are many more outside the national office
• carries approximately 1,000 ongoing live cases at any one time – some of which will last for several years.

Mr Ward added: “From a representative perspective, we cannot guarantee that legal representation will be provided by the Federation in every case as each must be considered on its merits; we will look not only at whether the matter occurred on duty but also the extent to which it could be said to be in the performance of police duty.”